Update on the updates
Well, by now you may have seen the post in lj_biz -- or not, since it's in lj_biz and not in the news where it should be.
Supposedly they clarified things.
In reality, it's one big mass of fail. They're back to the "child porn" aspect, but they're linking to a legal definition that specifically states that "This definition does not apply to depictions that are drawings, cartoons, sculptures, or paintings depicting minors or adults."
Many things are not addressed, and as I'm sure you can guess, the comments are flying fast and furious. Especially furious.
Some interesting links:
Ripoff Report -- unofficial, but pretty cool! And exactly what I've been complaining about ever since I found that article yesterday.
Obviously, they're using a different definition of "harm" -- The TOS states that they do not allow content that harms minors in any way, and that they do not allow content that causes physical harm or injury to a group or individual. So... got to protect those fictional (not) underage characters, but it's okay to post ways to starve yourself to death?